OVERPOPULATION

The Open Border Extremists Spit on the "Y" Generation

2011-12-15T07:48:00.000-08:00

I Especially Liked the Guest Article On the Foreign College Student Visa Horror

Article:

"...America has always been the land of promise. The promise to this generation was “Work hard, go to college; jobs will be waiting for you bright young things.” That promise is now riddled with cracks. Sen. Bennet was a former Denver Public Schools superintendent; he should know better. His focus should be on boosting America’s students here and now, on revitalizing the economy, on renewing that promise to this generation and the generations to come. Not flooding the market with more foreign labor while econ-Phd-holding Americans ring up toilet paper at Walmart...."

http://immigrationreform.com/2011/12/15/too-few-jobs-for-college-grads-bring-in-foreign-competition/

I got the best years out of Seattle, having been born there and then watching in horror as Bill Gates openned the overpopulation gates to destroy the area. Boeing's part manufacturing was snuffed out when they overbuilt Microsoft on already clogged existing freeways which they couldn't add on to. The local community college kids from the Seattle area were the predominant technical labor force in the late 70s developing the super sucessful 767 [today's Tanker A/C]....now Boeing outsources to foreign part suppliers and watches their quality and schedules go down the toilet...and we need foreigners clogging our already grim/scarce college educated job market, then destroying our quality and schedules too?

God bless America's "Y" Generation, the generation the open border extremists spit on.

Alabama's E-Verify Law is NOW Not Two Years From Now, Like the National Republican Bill

2011-09-20T13:52:00.000-07:00

Alabama's Current E-verify Implementation Made SWE Smile

Article in part:

"....Johnson's concern is shared by business owners in other states that have adopted laws like Alabama's. California farmers are so worried about the effects of E-Verify they have lobbied federal lawmakers to create a new temporary worker designation so they can retain their current labor force, the Fresno Bee recently reported.
...."

http://www.legalzoom.com/news/business/immigration/alabama-business-owners-anxious-about-800581468

I loved the reference "current", RE: E-verify implementation in Alabama. Now these Alabama state Republicans would definitely get SWE's vote.

Seeeeeee....ya don't need a year or two to implement E-verify with phony Republican Bills, follow Alabama's "Current" coat tail. Now, you blue dog Dem/Rep's and IA employers can go on a defamation of character rampage against SWE's article.

The Election Process is a Dem/Rep Immigration Circus

2011-09-20T13:49:00.000-07:00

The Dem/Rep Circus Tents are All Set Up for the 2012 Election

Welcome American voters to the immigration law enforcement Illusion Tent, cries the circus barker.

The circus schedule is slated for a year or two of foot draggin' on E-verify so ya all buy your tickets and be prepared for the clown acts. We have the open border Democrats on one end of the arena and the elephant Republicans on the other side with "enforcement" banners over their backs, while they both pretend to fight each other for the covetted votes of the voter audience.

Enjoy the ficticious and time wasting hot air show!

The Republicans Want a Year or Two to Aid America's Unemployed

2011-09-20T13:45:00.000-07:00

He Made Partial Sense Until He Stated This

"...This is why the problem doesn't get solved. The reality is that if the people in D.C. actually want to put an end to illegal immigration, they could do it within a year or two without resorting to the open borders and amnesty crowd's favorite imaginary bugaboo: rounding up millions of people, one by one, and deporting them...."

http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2011/09/20/how_to_fix_our_illegal_immigration_problem_in_5_steps

What's this BS of waiting a year or two for results, RE: current laws on the books????

The unemployed Americans can't wait a year or two for E-verify in the workplace and the rationale for doing it, IMO, is just smoke and mirror Republican talk to get their open border candidates elected, pretending they're doing something, with no results but hot air in the present time.

Job Creation Requires Halting Immigration Overpopulation

2011-09-20T13:40:00.000-07:00

On the "Current" Job Creation Issue

We all know E-verify implemented NOW is the key, but the article also highlighted a Dem/Rep failing in immigration practice too, as follows:

"... While immigration is supposed to respond to economic conditions, at least in theory, the solution from members on both sides of the aisle in the face of a crippling recession and the highest unemployment rate in thirty years is to bring in even more foreign workers..."

http://immigrationreform.com/

The lion's share of the current crop of Dem/Rep politicians apparently just don't get it. It doesn't take a rocket scientist economist to predict without a halt to chronic levels of overpopulation through legal/illegal immigration NOW, we're throwing overpopulation gasoline on the CURRENT unemployment bon fire.

Great article FAIRUS.ORG. Another GREAT reason for depopulation in America. I enjoyed the neutral partisan approach of the article too, SWE's cup of tea [a real Tea Party for depopulation].

Sanctuary States Are Two Faced

2011-09-14T09:04:00.000-07:00

Time Magazine Shows Washington State’s Unemployment Worsening, More than Average State Levels

Article:

“….Unemployment has been hovering at or above 9 percent for more than two years and real average hourly wages for those who have jobs declined 1.3 percent over the 12 months through July. Even with 3 percent growth in the economy last year, real median income for U.S. households dropped in 2010 to the lowest level since 1996, according to a census report issued yesterday….”

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Pessimism-Rises-as-72-See-US-bloomberg-450303520.html;_ylt=AgOYk1NZveIFyG_dKQgW3767YWsA;_ylu=X3oDMTE1MmhtNzk5BHBvcwMzBHNlYwN0b3BTdG9yaWVzBHNsawNwZXNzaW1pc21yaXM-?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=main&asset=&ccode=

I see even household incomes are dropping now, even with more multiple incomes living in each home.

A caveat, I manage a company which employs my daughter [she gets most of the loot], yet the contract by the state requires background checks and if you commit a crime [just about anything] you’re fired. The state requires proof of residency [SS card and drivers licence], but this sanctuary state will allow IAs [hey, they commit law breaking just by being here] to submit power bills and other winks and nods. We’ve become a lawless state, yet we fire for being lawless….am I missing something here? It isn’t like the IAs work for any less loot either.

Let's Terminate Almost All Legal Immigration

2011-07-21T06:48:00.000-07:00

Let's end the current legal immigration system. I wouldn't let them in America unless they were like a Wernher Magnus Maximilian, Freiherr von Braun [a German rocket scientist, aerospace engineer, space architect, and one of the leading figures in the development of rocket technology in America]....but now-a-days, since we've basically killed the domestic space programs, even his talents aren't good enough anymore.

We've got too many unemployed and highly educated/degreed, to use that as an excuse to even add more highly skilled technical workers to America in immigration.

Article on 2011 Unemployed Engineers:

"....Recently Unemployed – If you are newly unemployed times are going to be rough. You are entering a market that is filled with discouraged job seekers; many have been looking for over a year. You do have a small advantage though; you probably have an active network of employed associates. These individuals can assist you finding another job that may or may not be related to engineering. You may have to sit your ego aside and take a job position that does not relate to engineering. If you hold out to long, you will be joining the next group; the long-term unemployed.
Over a Year Unemployed – If you have been unemployed for a long time, you may still have a while to go before you will find another engineering position. After a year of seeking employment with no luck it may become very hard to motivate yourself. You may even want to give up, but keep on trying to find something. Unemployment benefits dose not pay all of the bills, and there is a limit to how many months you can receive a government check. Although the US Congress is arguing over how to pay for these payments, you can not count on the government. Eventually, you will have to find employment somewhere even though it may not be engineering. These employers know that as soon as you find another engineering job you will leave without any hesitation. So this rules out convenience stores, store clerk, security guard, and so on...."

http://tier5unemploymentextensionnews.com/are-engineering-jobs-recovering-from-the-recession/

Overpopulated Countries Hog Manufacturing

2011-04-26T10:12:00.000-07:00

The Parts and End item Inventory Drying Up In Earthquake/Radiation Distressed Japan, Impacts America's Metro Areas Significantly

Article in part:

“…Toyota’s car production in Japan plummeted a staggering 62.7% in March due to a parts supply crunch following the earthquake and tsunami….”

Another alarming statistic for the any major area’s car dealers' cuts to the local economy, a HUGE consumer base of Japanese cars, article in part:

“…Toyota gets more than 90 percent of its auto components in Japan, according to Saito….”

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2014715537_apasjapanearthquakeautomakers.html

http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2011-04-25-Toyota.htm

Imagine April’s Numbers and from the day of the earthquake March 11-March 31 2011: it represents about 64% of the month of March 2011 too

Japan is Overpopulated and No Where to Hide

2011-03-21T10:30:00.000-07:00

softwarengineer
March 21, 2011 at 10:07 am | Permalink
This New Libya War Obama Orchestrated/Caused is a Great Distraction

Off the much more important Japanese disaster, IMO. Article in part:

“…Container ships sit in the Pacific or at docks in Japan, wary of unloading tons of pork and steak because of that nation’s fractured electric grid. Any break in the “cold chain” of refrigeration can spoil meat.

LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton, the luxury goods maker based in Paris, shut more than 50 of its stores in Tokyo and northern Japan. And Volvo, the Swedish carmaker, was working with a 10-day supply left of Japanese-built navigation and climate control systems.

“It’s hour-by-hour work to get a grip on the situation,” said Per-Ake Froberg, chief spokesman for Volvo, as it girds for a production halt….”

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Crises-in-Japan-Ripple-Across-nytimes-3260141995.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=7&asset=&ccode=

The Chevy Cobalt uses a safety recalled Japanese Corolla power steering unit, the 767 [Tanker A/C] is 15% Japanese, etc, etc, etc……just about everything has the Japanese parts shortage curse in it today.

I predict MAJOR AMERICAN Aerospace/Automotive stopworks on programs and models due to Japanese part shortages. How long will it take to get domestic parts/assemblies replacements going to replace the Japanese? My estimate is 2-5 years, and that’s long before Japan will ever rebuild it’s infrastructure and factory capacity; especially with nuclear meltdowns needing to buried. Article in part:

“…THE damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant must be scrapped, the country's top government spokesman has said. He also revealed “abnormal levels” of radiation had again been detected in milk and spinach taken from areas near the plant. The comment by the Chief Cabinet Secretary, Yukio Edano, yesterday was the first word from the government that the nuclear complex will have to be closed once its overheating reactors are brought under control. In some of the first hopeful signs in the 10-day battle to stabilise the disabled power station, power has been restored to cooling pumps at four of the six reactors.

❏ Hiroe Campbell recalls the radiation sickness that followed the bombing of Hiroshima…

The state of the cooling systems in two other reactors at Fukushima, Nos. 1 and 2, are uncertain, and authorities continue to battle to keep the most damaged reactors, Nos. 3 and 4, under control by dousing them with water. The number of people confirmed dead or missing after the earthquake and tsunami has risen to more than 20,000 as the grim task of recovery continues….”

http://www.silobreaker.com/japan-reactors-5_2264442058510958665

IMO, as a Nuclear Engineer, at least 1 reactor needs to be buried alive [still fissile hot and melting] with cement [the Japanese Nuclear Director admitted it Friday, he was in tears, albeit this MSM news story has dissappeared from internet search engine searches today] and possibly two more melting Chernobyls to take care of in like manner. Japan is such a smaller and overpopulated land mass with horrifying radiation spewing all over right now, at least the massive sized Soviet Union had somewhere for the refugees to run from their Chernobyl….FAR less a problem in comparison, even with one reactor needing to be buried alive.

This radiation problem is Japan’s first problem to take care of and IMO, we’re looking at 5-10 years to bulldoze the radioactive top soils and tear down radioactive infrastructures to rebuild again into the sea before they can even start rebuilding the Toyota and Honda plants near the reactors.

It’s HORRIFYING.

Govenment Home Price Incentives Don't Produce Jobs

2010-03-26T10:00:00.000-07:00

25,000,000 people are U6 unemployed and I’d add in an estimated 10-20,000,000 giveups or youth with no job experience [like college and highschool graduates over the last few years] not counted in the U6 group too….

Let’s see, theres a potential good economy 155,000,000 jobs in America.

That gives us a 23-29% range of actual unemployment right now in America. Tell me please, how is raising house prices with government debt gonna put this unemployed army back to work?

Overpopulation Kills Public School Math and Science

2010-03-11T14:55:00.000-08:00

The Brainless Rhetoric on Amnesty Goes Off the Richtor Scale. I just stumbled on this new public school system to teach math and science better in Seattle, article in part: "...The draft report also addresses the debate over how much should be expected from immigrants who are just learning English. An introduction to the standards explains that English language learners should be held to the same standards but should be given more time and instructional support to meet the requirements...." http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100310/ap_on_re_us/us_schools_standards I betcha these same open border anarchist school curriculum planners also blame working parents for not spending enough time with their kids helping them pass math and science....LOL...they'll never blame themselves. Hades, I'm a math minor with graduate level training in engineering sciences and I could easily teach highschool math and science trouble is, I have a fulltime job and need to sleep weeknights too....so there's no way even I could pinch hit for the public school teachers for my child, if they're spending all the extra support money teaching immigrant kids English [they are]....LOL. My proof is the public schools worked fine for math and science, years ago, before the deluge of non-English speaking students hit the public school fan. The open border anarchists doing our public school curriculum planning would never admit it though [yet even these same teachers at public schools make sure to send their kids to good private schools, if they can....LOL].

Our American Unemployment Rate Is Lowballed By 2-3.5%

2010-03-05T09:25:00.000-08:00

I was reading Pete Murphy's Five Short Blasts [2007] and he documents approx. 3 million immigrants [legal and illegal] added in each year to America. Assuming they all want jobs, the unemployment rate is off approx -2-3.5%, as it ignores the need for a 2-3.5% growth in new jobs each year/month/week. MSM alleges it's only 0.8-1.4% [100K/mo] insourced foreign population into America needing jobs [the % range occurs assuming America needs 87-160M jobs] per article in part: "...Still, hiring is likely to be weak for much of that time. The recession eliminated about 8.4 million jobs. And it takes 100,000 new jobs per month just to keep up with population growth and keep the unemployment rate from rising...." http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Unemployment-rate-unchanged-apf-2244283326.html?x=0 But I'd bet they're low balling it to put lipstick on the American economy pig and likely ignoring illegals and I'm sure Pete isn't....LOL

P.S. The 87M jobs needed is MSM, the 160M jobs needed came from Dr. Roubini's RGE Blog source. Lord only knows what number is correct.

You can't trust the MSM takes [I heard there were 160 million jobs needed in America from Dr. Roubini's Website]. If you take the 9.7% UR with 8.4M unemployed, you get 87M American jobs needed. This means MSM is under-reporting unemployment by approx 1.4%, not 0.8%. It means Pete Murphy documents approx 3.5% under-reporting of unemployment. But we all know the US BLS under-reported unemployment all along, they even admitted it: "...The March 2009 benchmark level for total nonfarm employment is 131,175,000 this figure is 902,000 below the sample-based estimate for March 2009, an adjustment of -0.7 percent..." http://www.bls.gov/web/cesbmart.htm Then we have the other missing BLS unemployed documented in article in part: "...According to the BLS, the US lost another 20,000 jobs in January. However, the BLS reported that the unemployment rate dropped from 10% of the labor force to 9.7%. How is that possible, more people lose their jobs, but the unemployment rate goes down? That is the Washington Math. To add insult to injury the BLS also revised its statistics and says now that since the recession began an extra 1.2 million jobs have been lost. Instead of the 7.2 million jobs previously reported lost. Therefore, actually 8.4 million jobs have been lost. You would think that this “mistake” admission would cause the actual unemployment rate to go up. But who is counting anyway.The numbers game gets worse.December’s job losses alone were revised from 85,000 lost jobs to 150,000. This is an unbelievable revision and shocking when presented with such remarkable proof. This is a 76% error which the BLS, the President and most of the media has ignored. With those numbers, the unemployment rate for December was really about 10.2% (not counting the people no longer looking for work, more on that below) The numbers games coming from Washington has become so ridiculous that it is best to ignore what they say. None of these upward corrections caused the BLS and President Obama to revise the unemployment numbers for December 2009 upwards, as they should have been...." http://www.naplesnews.com/blogs/no-more-doubletalk/2010/feb/07/politics/ Believe evetthing you read....LOL

USCIS And the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

2010-02-24T10:55:00.000-08:00

Are Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum...foreign companies can hire H-1Bs illegally and foreign automobile companies can bring automobiles in America with serious safety defects; and as long as it's foreign, it get's their Betty Crocker Seal of Approval. Fraud or no fraud.

Our American Engineering/Mangement Jobs Base Backbone is Broken

2010-02-24T10:53:00.000-08:00

I.E., domestic engineered/managed automobiles in America went down the toilet.

Yet these slavelord companies want more H-1Bs on the cheap to keep American college graduates out of the labor force for prevailing wages.

BTW, the legal American college graduates that haven't worked yet, aren't counted as unemployed.

POPULATION DENSITY INCREASE IN AMERICA HAS DESTROYED THE MIDDLE CLASS

2009-12-16T10:29:00.000-08:00

What is Middle Class Anymore?

Is it the $40-50K avg income per household?

Is it the top 10% of American household incomes, i.e., $90K on up?

Does the avg wage per household include the top 1% making it approx.flat a complete exageration?

An excerpt from Pete Murphy’s “Five Short Blasts”, Chapter 1, The Economy’s Doing So Great, [bear in mind the book was written in 2007, before the horrifying collapses of household incomes in 2008-2009]:

“…Here, once again, we see that at least half of all American families, represented by the medium line, have faired poorly over the last three decades. Medium income was growing nicely until the mid-70s. From that point it declined sharply until 1992, at which time it began a slow rebound. Yet, as of 2004, it remained 1.5% below its peak in 1976. Why is this? You have to wonder. Did something happen at that time in the mid-70s, that caused the earning power of most Americans to grind to a halt?…” [I'd add too, household incomes started adding more wage earners per house about that time too, what good it did]

Pete also makes it clear in Chapter 1:

“…The rich are getting richer – much, much richer – while the poor are getting poorer and while the middle class melts away. Virtually all the growth in wages and salaries, household and family incomes is concentrated in the upper class elite of American society….”

STATISTICS LIARS FOR OVERPOPULATION

2009-12-01T10:05:00.000-08:00

Statistics can make Any of Us Liars

The Institute for Supply Management, a trade group of purchasing executives, said its index grew last month....LOL...compared to the last recession/depression data months. Its like saying the dead yellow plants were more plentiful during the Great Depression's dust bowl.

Let's compare today's manufacturing activity to say, 2006....its horrifying today then. One of the charts show cargo in trains up 5% in 2006, instead of like -20% lately. The URL proof:

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/15898703/Rail-Time-Indicators-November-2009

Most of main stream media ignores the hoards of new desparate Americans looking for work at HomeDepot, but will point at horrifying statistical trends as encouraging.....ohhh, stocks are up today and the twisted logic manufacturing index improvement [????] is given the credit, LOL.

CHINA HAS EGG ON ITS FACE: Updated 12/10/09

2009-11-17T13:47:00.000-08:00

There's a Silver Lining To the Economic Mess We're In

Sure, amnesty overpopulation is like adding gasoline to the American unemployment bonfire....but, the open border anarchists' blind rage for amnesty is throwing the baby out with the bath water, IMO. Even a blind rage anarchist is going to "get it" eventually.

Its not just a matter of overpopulating America like Napolitano rants, driving wages down and hogging all the votes.

Since 2006, its estimated yearly world oil consumption/day during this economic mess collapse is approx flat through 2009. Look, we solved global warming and just as if the cure of overpopulation was implemented, albeit the world's short-term stimulus debts brought global warming back up to the horrifying levels it was before the economic crash....the media won't admit it.

IMO. the economic collapse of reduced oil consumption [taking stimulus debt out] is approx equivalent to reducing the earth's population from 6 billion to 3.4 billion in global warming gas reduction and we demonstrated it in just 3 years. Now we can dream, that's good. Or reducing world oil consumption from 85 million/bbls/day to 55.

Throw the old economic models out that growth is good in America and return to environmental science again is possible with a new plan and a clear demonstration of how it works. China knows their shores are plagued by warmer water jelly fish this year, clearly due to global warming IMO. Their reaction was, so what, we're going to burn more energy and ignore the environmental warning signs.

Get it?

Its a silver lining this economic mess. It makes the growth is good rant from countries like China a total joke. Its been clearly disproven by our recent oil use reduction and the real organised crime in the world aren't hiding anymore....

America must lead in example. Step one, depopulate itself and compete with China/Europe. How you ask? The old fashion way, "Yankee Ingenuity", in a world that needs to shrink its population or destroy itself. The fix is gonna take decades bloggers, but smile.....the model of depopulation works!

There is no other way out that doesn't destroy the earth.

GOLD MAY BE $1100/OZ

2009-11-13T14:38:00.000-08:00

But let's be real, where's the hoards of Americans lining up to buy gold? How would most of them pay for it, even if they wanted it as a hedge against the falling dollar?

I have noticed jewelry at discount rates lately though, like 70% off sales for gold items….especially buying on places like eBay auctions from bankrupt jewelers’ inventory.

Example: I weighed a 14K gold [that's 50% gold and 50% silver] chain for $78 at Walmart a week or two ago and believe me, if gold’s $1100/oz Walmart didn’t pay for the gold chain jewelry labor….LOL

And this was Walmart’s regular price….not on sale. BTW, no one was shopping for jewelry the 30 min I stood there….the two sales girls were begging me to buy.

Will cash for gold give you $78 for the Walmart gold chain….Hades no, I bet you’d be lucky to get $20….

Oil goes up 250% in about a year due to dollar deflation, yet gas maybe went up like 25-35% [excess supplies are going through the roof too].

Its been documented recently that grocery stores are lowering prices to attract a dwindling customer base, as I’ve noticed even Discount Wharehouse prices can be beat by more expensive stores in my neighborhood (i.e., Albertson/Safeway/FredMeyer/QFC) sales prices….beaten badly too. I guess we’re eating less and/or more cheaply with this recession/depression with no end.

So where is this alleged inflation monster? In our heads?

China Has a Smoke and Stimulus Mirror Economy Right Now Too

Its documented in Fortune magazine (11/29/2009) and basically states China can’t continue their stimulus debt economy either, its following America over the debt cliff too.

You shut their stimulus debt off in that nation and their horrifying unemployment problem today would double or triple….imagine the angry mobs in that nation that already can’t feed its people.

Fortune magazine (11/29/09) has an article called “Investing” and it states:

“…56% of unemployed will never get rehired…”

And you think they’ll pay ‘em more in devalued dollars as American unemployment SNOWBALLS at that rate? Remember too, the 10.2% excludes the ones who’s unemployment benefits ran out, college kids looking for work and the minions that have settled for minimum wage type jobs so they could eat [I estimate about 50,000,000 in America, adding them all together to date].

Fortune magazine stated its a good time for employers to shop for high quality employees now, with the chronic snowballing of unemployed [all professions, degreed or not] in America….but do you really believe they’re gonna pay ‘em more, after the lucky few get hired…LOL

Its All Changed in 2009

The college degreed unemployment spiked 85% earlier this year:

More degreed unemployment news in part:

“…The total number of unemployed increased by more than 50 percent from January 2008 through last month, but the number of jobless Americans 55 or older jumped 70 percent, according to new Labor Department numbers released Friday.

And for people with college degrees, the number rose even more sharply, by nearly 85 percent.

The numbers confirmed a trend that job cuts are moving up the age and educational ladders, said Andrew Stettner, deputy director of the National Employment Law Project….”

the rest of the URL:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/02/06/national/a152330S41.DTL

Mainstream media and the colleges would never admit it, doesn’t matter that much anymore if you have a degree or not…..actually, I hear nursing jobs with lower paid LPNs are safer than higher paid RN positions….LOL

DON'T CLEAN OUT YOUR COLLEGE GRADUATE'S ROOM YET

2009-11-12T14:26:00.000-08:00

About 80% Of America's College Graduate's Move Back Home With Mom and Dad

I believed in legal immigration when America had enough water and jobs for the additional load [back when we had maybe 150M people]....and the lame brain excuse its OK if they have advanced degrees or special skills is moot too, college educated unemployment spiked 85% earlier this year.

Numbersusa totally agrees with me too and wants a moratorium on all immigration until we find jobs for the U2, U3 and U4 unemployment counts.....multiply the 10.2% mainstream media unemployment rate by about 2-3 and you'll get the real number that compares historically to the Great Depression's 25% unemployed. Numbersusa agrees with my unemployment analyses too.

http://www.numbersusa.com/content/nusablog/beckr/november-9-2009/102-unemployment-these-groups-are-lobbying-more-foreign-workers-give-

Article Out On Unemployed Americans

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31275812/ns/health-kids_and_parenting/

It makes those small household income increases the elite shove at us lately look like a complete joke, with the number of workers per household obviously increasing at a horrifying rate due to forced cohabitation of family and about 80% of the college graduates.

More news on overpopulation impact on the US economy:

http://money.cnn.com/2009/09/30/pf/taxes/who_pays_taxes/index.htm?postversion=2009093012

Basically, only half of Americans households pay any income tax at all. You can imagine that % going way up with amnesty of low wage illegal aliens incorporated.

SMOKE AND STIMULUS MIRRORS TO JUSTIFY OVERPOPULATION

2009-11-09T14:46:00.000-08:00

Deficits Cure Short Term Ills and Cause Horrifying Long Term Problems

I hear the G20 has agreed to dig into their savings account to keep the world economies afloat, albeit without any supports for the US dollar. American stocks shot up with the wonderful news, but is it really wonderful?

China may have a 8% increase in their GDP, but IMO its all smoke and stimulus mirrors there too. They dig into their savings account until its dried up. China is urging America to control its deficits….LOL….yet, if we did, who’ll buy the Chinese stuff???? The Chinese themselves? LOL, they can barely feed themselves.

Who’ll buy the $29K Mercedes subcompacts when they sky-rocket to $60K with dollar devaluation? The Europeans? LOL, they’ll be lucky to still be making Mercedes, if we stop buying them.

There were many that predicted inflation with lower dollar rates and guess what, yes, oil is now $80/bbl [and supplies are snow-balling] ….but a little birdy is telling me, remember a stronger dollar a year ago, with $30/bbl oil…..yeah, gas was still $2 something a gallon like today. So what happenned, why didn’t the inflation monster get us by now? Even when oil was $150/bbl, we didn’t see $10/gal gas, inflation adjusted from $30/bbl $2/gal gas…..what the Hades is stopping the inflation monster?

Wages, lower wages my friends. The elite don’t want to talk about it, no, they say household incomes rise every year [yeah right, and so does the number living and working in each house].

I’ll repeat myself again….RE will never rebound in price unless per capita wages go up and that just ain’t gonna happen my friend.

NOW THEY ALLEGE Q3 2009 GDP IS 3.5%...LOL

2009-10-29T09:40:00.000-07:00

The Recession's Over and Q3 GDP is +3%, Break Out the H-1B Champaign

Per article from 9/2009 Whitehouse Q3 2009 report in part:

"...There is broad agreement that the ARRA has added between 2 and 3 percentage points to baseline real GDP growth in the second quarter of 2009 and around 3 percentage points in the third quarter...."

The rest of the URL:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/cea/Economic-Impact/

Meaning, without the almost $1 trillion dollar stimulus IOU to our grandkids, made earlier this year, our "H-1B champaign Q3 GDP" goes back to about zero [or worse, IMO].

Ask the approx 50,000,000 severely underemployed and unemployed Americans today if "the recession's over" and more uncontrolled population won't hurt us at all now.

Q3 GDP INCREASE/DECREASE A MOOT POINT

2009-10-15T09:32:00.000-07:00

The 2009 GDP Decrease is a Horrifying 3+%

But the recent Whitehouse economic data looks rosy for Q3, at a +2.2 [albeit Q1 was decreasing at 6+%]?

The problem with massive shifts down in the GDP and minor shifts up in the GDP is perception. Assuming the massive downward shifts earlier this year were as most economists called, "inventory" burning with no new sales; then the minor "inventory" recovery doesn't mean a return to the real estate bubble and using our homes as ATMs to over-consume, as before. The American Consumer is dead and inventory blips upward are almost completely meaningless compared with the approx 70% driver of our economy unrestored, the American Consumer.

See my proof in the article in part:

"....As Kevin hall at McClatchy newspapers argues, the consumer economy is dead, all starting in September 2008 when the US government seized Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy.

Hall writes: "One year later, the easy-money system that financed the boom era from the 1980s until a year ago is smashed. Once-ravenous U.S. consumers are saving money and paying down debt. Banks are building reserves and hoarding cash. And governments are fashioning a new global financial order."

That means recovery will be anemic, economic growth will be around 2% and it would be five years until the economy generates enough jobs to make up for those that have been destroyed.

It will be some time before the US economy becomes competitive again...."

The rest of the URL:

http://www.soxfirst.com/50226711/the_us_consumer_economy_is_dead.php

This is what overpopulation in America did to us.

OVERPOPULATION STIMULUS CAN'T STOP RECESSION/DEPRESSION

2009-10-08T09:51:00.000-07:00

Recession Over Per Paul Krugman?

Let's look at the 9/30/09 Q3 BEA Data in part:

"Advance Estimate Second Estimate Third Estimate
(Percent change from preceding quarter)

Real GDP................................. -1.0 -1.0 -0.7"

The rest of the BEA URL:

http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdpnewsrelease.htm

Gee, if the recession is over, how come the GDP is still negatively contracting, especially after the horrifying Q1 contractions [we'd need some real big positive 2009 GDP growth, not Q2/Q3 contractions, to make up for the lost Q1 ground, IMO]?

It seems a lot you economists have a variety of 2009 "recession's over" negative GDP rationales that contradict the one's you had before...LOL

The recession is obviously alive and kicking IMO. The recession over fairy tale is clear mathematical fiction.

OVERPOPULATION IN AMERICA A SECURITY RISK TOO

2009-10-07T14:20:00.000-07:00

Its Horrifying

This comes from the UK Register, dtd Mar 2008, article in part:

"...China also harvests spin-offs from foreign direct investment and joint ventures in the civilian sector, technical knowledge and expertise of students returned from abroad, and state sponsored industrial espionage to increase the level of technologies available to support military research, development, and acquisition.

Beijing’s long-term goal is to create a wholly indigenous defense industrial sector able to meet the needs of PLA modernization as well as to compete as a top-tier producer in the global arms trade. China is already competitive in some areas, such as communications, with leading international defense firms...."

The rest of the URL:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/04/pentagon_2008_report_china/

Add this brain drain from America to China's military buildup and you get horrifying laser capabilities threatening America, article in part:

"...Nevertheless, citing unnamed "top officials," the trade journal asserts that "China not only has the [anti-satellite] capability, but has exercised it. It is not clear when China first used lasers to attack American satellites. Sources would only say that there have been several tests over the past several years."..."

The rest of the DefenseTech.org URL:

http://www.defensetech.org/archives/002794.html#

SEPTEMBER 2009 JOB LOSSES AT ONLY 247K?????

2009-10-02T16:07:00.000-07:00

We're letting in 160K legal immigrants in each month with 15 million [its probably more like 30 million IMO] unemployed backlog....and job losses ???? each month [my guess is 300K-900K, the 247K figure is WAY too rosy] per the following "incomplete BLS analysis" available to date:

This is for Aug 2009 [the 213K BLS wild guess month], not Sep 2009's 247K per month wild guess, article in part:

"...Table C. States with statistically significant employment changes from July 2009 to
August 2009, seasonally adjusted
July August Over-the-month
2009 2009 p change p
Alabama........................................... 1,909,800 1,895,800 -14,000
Georgia............................................ 3,888,400 3,853,400 -35,000
Hawaii.............................................. 601,000 594,500 -6,500
Illinois............................................... 5,667,600 5,648,400 -19,200
Kansas............................................. 1,342,200 1,335,900 -6,300
Maryland.......................................... 2,548,500 2,536,500 -12,000
Michigan........................................... 3,864,000 3,821,100 -42,900
Minnesota........................................ 2,654,400 2,644,100 -10,300
Mississippi........................................ 1,118,400 1,108,800 -9,600
Montana........................................... 438,700 443,800 5,100
North Dakota.................................... 371,500 368,700 -2,800
Ohio................................................. 5,127,400 5,097,300 -30,100
Oregon............................................. 1,631,500 1,624,900 -6,600
Tennessee....................................... 2,664,200 2,649,100 -15,100
Texas............................................... 10,406,500 10,344,300 -62,200
Washington...................................... 2,864,200 2,851,800 -12,400
p = preliminary...."

The rest of the URL:

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/laus.pdf

BTW, the total job losses for Aug 2009 per the Table C above is 290.1K, yet excludes 26 job loss states....LOL

Indiana is one of the excluded states from Table C and was shedding jobs at 14,800/mo from Aug 2008-Aug 2009 [see Table D in BLS report URL above].

Until I see 50 state visibility in the BLS data, I see the 216K for Aug 2009 a completely wild guess, let alone the 247K they came up for Sep 2009 [not yet analysed since the latest Sep18 2009 report] as anything credible either.

Are they lying about America's monthly job losses [as horrifying as their lies are] to justify high legal immigration rates? I think they are. You can't prove me wrong....LOL

WHAT THE HADES IS AMERICA'S AUG 2009 JOB LOSS?

2009-09-24T11:40:00.000-07:00

The US Bureau of Labor and Statistics omits this data [I wonder why....LOL], but it is at least partially available in sites.NPPD.com. In fact, here’s some states job loss/gain data in the NPPD 9/21/09 news article in part:

“….Forty-two states reported job losses in August, with 14 states reporting unemployment rates of 10 percent or above, according to the U.S. Department of Labor, The heaviest losses came in Texas, which lost 62,200 jobs in August, with the manufacturing, construction, and leisure industries combined reaching 35,500 losses. In Michigan, 42,900 jobs were lost, with 25,000 of them in manufacturing; the state’s unemployment rate rose to 15.2 percent, the highest in the United States. Georgia and Ohio had the third- and fourth-highest losses in August, with 35,000 and 30,100 jobs lost, respectively. Nevada had the second-highest unemployment rate at 13.2 percent, with Rhode Island third at 12.8 percent and California and Oregon tied for fourth with 12.2 percent. Six states had increases in employment in August: North Carolina saw the biggest gains with 7,000, followed by Montana with 5,100 and West Virginia with 2,800. North Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska had the lowest unemployment rates in August, at 4.3 percent, 4.9 percent, and 5.0 percent, respectively….”

The rest of the URL:

http://www.areadevelopment.com/newsitems/9-21-2009/state-unemployment-statistics-august-2009.shtml

BTW, I went ahead and used this news article for Dr. Roubini’s bunch and gave my technical estimate for August 2009 job losses in America. States 5-47 were not in the data above, so I estimated an average for the missing states; based on the top 4 states with job losses and the bottom 3 states with job gains.

I came up with 742,000 estimated job losses in America for Aug 2009….makes that 216,000 wild guess [IMO] BLS number that mainstream news is using look like a complete joke, especially since BLS state to state job loss/gain data is conveniently omitted, not allowing an accuracy check.

I hear from Numbersusa sources that Wash St had a 92,000 monthly job loss….Hades, that’s not even in the NPPD data, let alone the omitted BLS wild guess....LOL

KEEPING THE ECONOMY GOING

2009-09-21T16:16:00.000-07:00

BTW, if I was Benanke, I’d be saying the depression is over too; its similar to pressure treatments the meat processing plants use to calm the cattle before they line up and head into “blood stenched” butcher factories, otherwise, we’d never get the cows in the door…LOL

WE'VE REACHED "THE MALTHUS POINT"

2009-09-17T12:06:00.000-07:00

Malthus Theory

Have you ever read George Orwell’s 1984? many of you may be too young, but that used to be required reading to get a high school diploma….its been replaced by our high schools with To Kill a Mockingbird.

Well, assuming you haven’t read it or seen the movie, Orwell predicted in the 30s that by 1984 computers would be watching us, the “newspeak” propaganda would be brainwashing us and man’s freedoms would be taken from him for the public good. I think Orwell was 20-25 years off; we’re living 1984 today. Look at video cameras everywhere, Patriot Act wire tapping into public communications, computers mesmerizing us with brainwashing newspeak [twisted words that make bad things seem good] and freedoms disappearing like the dodo bird, especially as uncontrolled growth mushrooms.

Well, Malthus also made some predictions about how overpopulation would reach an ultimate resource sustainable limit, called “The Malthus Point” about 150 years ago. The basics to Mathus Theory applied: is as Seattle gets more concentrated with population growth the per capita expenditures go down, the wages go down, unemployment and poverty goes way up. Sounds like 2009, doesn’t it; especially considerring both unemployment. [calculated honestly and using 1930 methods] and homelessness has never been so bad in America since the Great Depression.

Today’s economists hate Mathus Theory and so do globalists; as they allege man will continually invent new technology to allow the uncontrolled growth. Yet, when faced with chronic unemployment growth, they have no answer. Sound familiar to 2009 doesn’t it. Hence, the Orwellian newspeak we hear, the recession’s over…LOL

When per capita wages plummet, as they are today with uncontrolled growth in Seattle, there is no way RE prices can go up; unless we can lower interest rates more, which we can’t. We’ve reached that limit too.

AN OVERPOPULATED AMERICA CAN'T AFFORD WORLD HUNGER CARE ANYMORE

2009-09-16T14:11:00.000-07:00

Today's Reuter's Article States In Part:

"....Food aid is at a 20-year low despite the number of critically hungry people soaring this year to its highest level ever, the United Nations relief agency said Wednesday.

The number of hungry people will pass 1 billion this year for the first time, the U.N. World Food Program (WFP) said, adding that it is facing a serious budget shortfall...."

The rest of the URL:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090916/wl_nm/us_food_wfp;_ylt=AtWCMX68bH86wreDxo9nJ2J2wPIE;_ylu=X3oDMTJlYnYxM28wBGFzc2V0A25tLzIwMDkwOTE2L3VzX2Zvb2Rfd2ZwBGNwb3MDNQRwb3MDNQRzZWMDeW5fdG9wX3N0b3JpZXMEc2xrA3dvcmxkZm9vZGFpZA--

NATIONAL INITIATIVES AGAINST OVERPOPULATION

2009-09-16T09:41:00.000-07:00

Ralph Nader campaigned for National Initiatives in 2008, rather than relying on only lobbyist controlled politicians deciding our budget/futures and I thought his idea was simply wonderful.

The argument against any type of pure democracy is the masses don't understand and can make bad decisions.....LOL....as if our present government's overpopulation debt hasn't pushed us over the unemployment cliff. If bad decisions is the excuse not to let "We the People" vote on amnesty; what's their excuse for a horrifying track record of bad republic government led decisions on the economy?

Also, 80% of Americans consider America's economy in poor shape per a recent AP Poll....eat cake Bernanke and your "recession's over" rhetoric yesterday, Americans clearly don't buy it.

The Recession is Over?

As long as 50% of Americans maintain their household income to 1999 levels, inflation adjusted.

The rest of Americans don't matter to the Democrats or Republicans when calling the economy, they can eat cake.

After-all, $250K/yr household income elite [the approx top 5% of American household incomes BTW] is Middle Class [ask Clinton]. The real 50k/yr average household income in America [which has been stagnant since 1999] can eat cake.

This type of news is not found in economics textbooks or political bandwagon hype, it came from blogs; but it makes perfect common sense to me. Article in part:

"...The press release also said:

“More people were working, especially from households living in smaller flat types. The monthly household income of those living in 3-room HDB flats or smaller also grew by over $300 from $1,910 to $2,220. Even after factoring for inflation, this translated to a 3.5% per annum increase in real terms”.

However, this increase in household income may be due to more people working per household rather than an actual increase in household income. What we need to know is the employed per household data – whether it has gone up - and the extent of it resulting in the 3.5% increase...."

The rest of the URL:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sg_Review/message/5749?l=1

As America's phony unemployment count passes over the fact that one person is working two jobs to get by and/or there's three people working per household so they can eat, rather than the old 1.4 average....the conundrum of a flat household income at $50K looks far worse today, than 1999.

LOL....yes the recession is over for the 50% of Americans that still haven't lost their good jobs.....that is, until they get butcher axed too.

WE DON'T NEED NO FOREIGN WORKERS

2009-09-15T09:20:00.000-07:00

During my parents' era there was 1.2 worker per household [now its like 1.4]; and we made our house, almost everything in the house and the car in the driveway too....with far less workers/household than today. My dad and all the other households too, had plenty of vacation time to take us kids to Disneyland in the '63 Polara too. America's population was about 150M-200M back then; about half of today's population. And we need more overpopulation today?

I'd add too, a stay at home parent watching the kids [could be mom or dad] generally makes today's daycares a complete joke, quality-wise too. Ask any family socialogist or psychologist; they'll totally agree with me.

Its in China's, Europe's, Japan's, S. Korea's, etc., best interest that America start making about half their stuff [50% maufactured $ items used in America] again. We've reached the last chapter and page of debt; with phony glue board housing as a subpar manufacturing replacement. We can't buy anything from them, without a domestic wage tax base that isn't based on debt.

If these foreign countries have a brain, they'll totally agree with me.

Also, under the Obama/Bush plans; the American industrial base is just suppose to appear out of nowhere, as alleged bright technicals/businessmen start hiring for new ventures. LOL, the money's tight and there's no way we can compete on WTO rules with livable wages, let alone bringing in foreigners to overpopulate America and more RE price collapse.

Answer: start federal contracts with Buy American provisions for "American Manufacturing" ASAP and its much better federal money spent, than giving it away to the banksters....each theroretical American industrial base job creates 3 more Buy American jobs for material/services and all the federal tax costs for the contract(s) get repaid almost immediately and its slam dunk too :-)

Let the WTO eat cake.

OVERPOPULATION BEGETS UNEMPLOYMENT

2009-09-11T12:46:00.000-07:00

A three headed monster [reducing consumer spending], getting bigger and bigger everyday is an 85% spike in unemployment affecting college degreed professionals earlier this year alone:

States in part:

“…Electrical Engineers Experience Record Job Losses
The unemployment rage for electrical engineers doubled during the second quarter of 2009….”

the rest of the URL:

http://www.cio.com/article/496960/Electrical_Engineers_Experience_Record_Job_Losses

More degreed unemployment news in part:

“…The total number of unemployed increased by more than 50 percent from January 2008 through last month, but the number of jobless Americans 55 or older jumped 70 percent, according to new Labor Department numbers released Friday.

And for people with college degrees, the number rose even more sharply, by nearly 85 percent.

The numbers confirmed a trend that job cuts are moving up the age and educational ladders, said Andrew Stettner, deputy director of the National Employment Law Project….”

the rest of the URL:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/02/06/national/a152330S41.DTL

How about nursing? In part:

“….More hospitals have recorded mass layoffs in 2008 than in any year in the past decade. More than 9,700 hospital employees will have filed initial claims for unemployment compensation in 2008 as a result of mass layoffs. That would be highest such number since 2005, which saw nearly 13,300 laid off, and 28% more than the 10-year average. The news comes despite the relative optimism in healthcare as compared to the rest of the economy, where most other major sectors of employment have posted net losses of jobs for the year….”

The rest of the URL:

http://www.uannurse.org/research/pdfs/The-Hospital-Industry-2009.pdf

I’d add most of the layoffs are related to overpopulation and the surge in Uncompensated care, see surge chart in article above. The article above also states in part:

“…Uncompensated care is defined as the overall measure of hospital care provided for which no payment was received from the patient or employer. It is the sum of a hospital’s “bad debt” and the charity care it provides. Uncompensated care excludes other unfunded costs of care, such as underpayment from Medicaid and Medicare…”

How about teachers? See the California news and believe me, its coming to a theater near you too very soon:

“….California law requires local school districts to inform teachers, counselors, nurses and other school employees by March 15 that they could be laid off at the end of the school semester. The across-the-board budget cuts have pushed districts to issue layoff notices to more than 26,000 teachers….”

The rest of the URL:

http://www.cftl.org/centerviews/april09.html

I’d add

etc, etc….

THE UNCONTROLLED GROWTH MAGIC ACT

2009-09-11T09:21:00.000-07:00

Obama is like the magician with the amnesty dove in his suit coat: he promises no public option healthcare for illegal aliens and enforcement against illegal alien employers in his magic act....then quickly draws the amnesty dove out to amaze the audience, making the diversion issues against illegal aliens and their employers a moot point.

BIRTH CONTROL SAVES GOV'T MONEY

2009-09-09T09:14:00.000-07:00

Family Planning Works About Five Times More Effective than Throwing More Government Money at the Horrifying Green Problem(s)

The article states in part:

"...Every £4 spent on family planning over the next four decades would reduce global CO2 emissions by more than a ton, whereas a minimum of £19 would have to be spent on low-carbon technologies to achieve the same result, the research says..."

The rest of the URL:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/6161742/Contraception-cheapest-way-to-combat-climate-change.html

Tell that to the CFR members brainlessly intent on more and more uncontrolled overpopulation growth in high per capita energy use America. LOL

A REAL UNEMPLOYMENT SOLUTION

2009-09-07T12:24:00.000-07:00

Why Don’t We Put the 10s of Millions of Unemployed in America to Work on the American Farms?

We could pay them $50/hr and it wouldn’t matter much for our like Safeway food prices too.

Article in part:

“…Consumers benefit from low farm wages, but less than many people believe: Farm wages constitute a surprisingly small part of the prices consumers pay at the grocery store. Farmgate prices average approximately one-third of retail prices, and labor costs represent approximately one-third of farmgate prices for fruits, vegetables, and horticultural products. This means, for example, that a 10-percent increase in farm wages would increase retail prices by at most 1 percent….”

The rest of the URL

http://www.urban.org/pubs/pap/summary.html

Most of what drives food increases has nothing to do with hiring low wage farm slaves, its packaging, like glass, aluminum and plastics….and the diesel to deliver the food [all driven higher by recent overpopulation driving energy higher and higher in price]….but let’s not forget one key food cost impact, especially the like Safeway profits [LOL]

Even America’s water shortages delta’s worsening, mainly due to uncontrolled overpopulation/immigration since 1990, adds costs and energy use to food….the deeper we dig for water the more energy it costs to pump it out. The Baby Boomers did good with their negative fertility rate since 1990, but only scientists types like me give them environmental kudos for a job well done, not corporate power political lobbyists for slave wages and lower RE prices.

But I’m just a scientist type who talks pragmatic. Go ahead, call me a hater for telling the truth, but you know, science truth has absolutely nothing to do with brainless defamation of character against me or unscientific pig-headed politics, clearly controlled by big corporations seeking slave wages anyway.

Reply – Quote

OVERPOPULATION HOMELESSNESS

2009-08-16T13:27:00.000-07:00

Speaking of American Homelessness

I'm looking at a 2009 Seattle Seahawks United Way Calendar sitting in my dining room right now that says, "Not since the Great Depression have so many families been without homes."

I'd add a caveat to the 2009 United Way poster; we have unemployment extensions, marginally adequate food banks without a dust bowl impact and a FDIC [at least partially funded anyway...LOL] today.....so we should have much less homelessness IMO to be compared the same as the Great Depression.

UNEMPLOYMENT DEPRESSION

2009-08-07T12:23:00.000-07:00

We Lost a Quarter of a Million Jobs In July, Its Getting Worse, So Why Do We Need Even Educated Illegal Aliens?

Then unemployment went down 0.1%....how's that....well it acually may of only gone down 0.01%, because it was 9.46% [9.5% rounded off].

Also, the 9.4% anomaly could be moot point number manipulation during the June improvement [?] as follows:

"....One of the reasons the unemployment rate did not rise more than it did in June was due to a shrinkage of the labor force of 155,000 workers, partially offsetting the labor force gain in May of 350,000 workers...."

The rest of the URL:

http://www.epi.org/publications/entry/jobs_picture_20090702/

I think when the 9-10% low-ball unemployment calculation hits the top 5% of household incomes very soon, the MSM and Dem/Reps won't be calling a quarter of million monthly job losses a reason to rejoice and break out the champaign. This MSM nonsense won't have a willing mouthpiece anymore.

Population Growth and Chronic Unemployment Increases

The mixture of growth and job loss did not occur during GD I, but we have this plague today, a good article in part:

“…Furthermore, the loss of 6.5 million jobs over the 18 months of this recession dramatically understates the hole in the current labor market. To keep up with population growth, the economy needs to add around 127,000 jobs every month, so the labor market needed to grow 2.3 million jobs over this period. All told, the labor market is currently 8.8 million jobs below where it would need to be to maintain pre-recession employment levels. If there is any good news in this report, it is that despite the increase in job loss from May, the pace of losses still appears to be slowing from the enormous declines of earlier this year. In the first quarter of 2009, the economy shed 691,000 jobs per month, on average, but in the second quarter the losses averaged 436,000 jobs per month.

The continued losses, however, mean unemployment is still rising. This recession has set a new unemployment benchmark as unemployment has increased by 4.6 percentage points, higher than the rise of unemployment in the 1980s recession. Unemployment rose from 9.4% in May to 9.5% in June as 218,000 people were added to the jobless rolls. One of the reasons the unemployment rate did not rise more than it did in June was due to a shrinkage of the labor force of 155,000 workers, partially offsetting the labor force gain in May of 350,000 workers. There are now 14.7 million unemployed workers in this country, up 7.2 million from the start of the recession. The picture changes dramatically, though, when considering the broader measure of underemployment. If the ranks of the “marginally attached” (jobless workers who want a job but are not actively seeking work and so are not counted as officially unemployed) and “involuntary part-time workers” (those who want full-time jobs but can’t get the hours) are added to the mix, the figure rises to 25.9 million, which means nearly one in six U.S. workers (16.5%) is either un- or underemployed….”

The rest of the GD II URL:

http://www.epi.org/publications/entry/jobs_picture_20090702/

This is GD II using historical GD I unemployment as the marker for today. To me, chronic unemployment getting worse and worse is the definition of a depression.

The GD I stocks did fall 50% and then rebounded 6 months later by 50% [25% of the old high]; very close to what GD II did today. in 2009.

See the chart for GD I, to possibly predict GD II:

http://creditwritedowns.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/dow-1928-1932.png

Even Obama Agrees With Me On Unemployment

Article in part:

"...The new Labor Department numbers show that employers cut 247,000 jobs in July, another job loss but also the smallest reduction of any month this year. The unemployment rate dropped marginally from 9.5 percent to 9.4 percent, although one of the reasons for that change is that hundreds of thousands of people left the labor force...."

The rest of the URL:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_economy_obama

WE INVENTED THINGS IN THE 60s AND 70s

2009-07-21T08:29:00.000-07:00

Hades, even the Space Shuttle is an old 70s invention, yet we tout it as a Baby Boomer invention.

Look around, almost everything we have in our house /office [except smaller versions] was invented prior to the 80s: this includes plasma TVs, PCs, internet, LCDs, ultrasound, microcircuits, etc, etc....the internal combustion engine was a 1900 invention and we argue if the Japanese do better than the Americans remaking this antique system.

Even today's PhDs aren't publishing like they did in the 60s and 70s. So why have we apparently almost stopped inventing in America?

I believe its because over-crowded nations don't have the "hope" and "dreams" that people have when they have clean air and open spaces. Kids in the 60s and the 70s grew up on like acre lots or more; while some of today's kids live in home owners associations with homes 8' apart [if they're lucky]....a massive chunk of kids today are crammed in 2 bdrm apartments with a single parent barely making it.

More proof of my substantiated allegation is the World Economic Forum's (WEF's) 2007 Rankings of countries in technological innovation. America used to be number one, but with all its recent population growth, has dropped down to #7. That's not bad [Japan's #19, India's #44, Mexico's #49 and China's #59]. But, dinky Denmark is #1 and almost all the top ten slots were grabbed by European countries; i.e., countries that controlled population growth!

I'll give you this historical WEF website reference:

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070403-world-economic-forum-relea...

The URL above probably won't work anymore and they stopped tracking population technological rankings at 2007....my guess is America isn't in the top ten anymore with all its population growth and the WEF Rankings are also an apparent embarrassment to globalists outsourcing to Asian countries.

I saved it this Overpopulation website, anticipating the "globalist politics" clouding/mitigating free thought [just scroll down to my 6/26/08 entree].

DEPOPULATION CURES GLOBAL WARMING: Updated 12/11/09

2009-06-25T13:26:00.000-07:00

YE OF LITTLE FAITH

So you don’t trust ole softie’s gut feel projections.
World Oil Consumption is approx flat since 2004-2009 at approx 84-86 million barrels/day.

Compare that to the 2009 projection URL of 85 at $70/barrel, and golly gee willerkers….we’re using about the same oil in 2009 than 2006, even with a horrifying economic downturn. That's very odd indeed isn't it?

IMO there could likely be an approx 40% oil use consumption increase tied to Chinese stimulus/oil debt use. Add in the short-term world stimulus debt injections in America/Europe and the oil we saved by reducing economic activity was lost to short-term debt. I still see the freeways where I live with substantially reduced traffic in 2009 and stand firm in my prediction. Without world stimulus debt, especially China, I imagine we could be at 55 miliion barrels/day oil use, right now....the equivalent of slashing world population density by approx 40% too, curing global warming. We're debt apparently infusing global warming right now.

Maybe we don’t need all them hybrids and smart cars after all? All we needed was the equivalent of depopulation to solve global warming, a good ole fashion economic crisis? LOL

Low Fertility Rates Are Good for the Environment

2008-11-04T13:25:00.000-08:00

I'd add too that the 100M added to our population since 1990 has been basically linear [don't blame it all on Bush or Clinton, as it was equally both their faults] and mostly immigration....adding in the illegal aliens borrowing the subprime loans too, makes it even worse.
The legal American citizen Baby Boomers did not cause this post 1990 population growth; it was clearly uncontrolled immigration. The need to build new homes and degrade the environment since 1990 was basically uncontrolled immigration and a concurrent shut down of our American domestic industrial base [globalization].
Here's some Numbersusa data in part:
"....1970-80The American fertility rate fell to replacement level in 1972, making it possible for the nation to eventually reach a widely held dream for a stable population. A national government commission recommended that the nation would be best served in reaching its environmental, economic and social goals by a stabilizing population. Numerous experts and commentators predicted that each decade would see lower and lower population growth until early in the 21st century there would be no growth at all.
1980-90Despite continuing below-replacement-level fertility, population growth continued at the level of the previous decade. The reason was that Congress had created a system of chain migration that snowballed and doubled annual legal immigration over traditional levels. Further adding to the population, Congress for the first time ever rewarded illegal aliens -- about 3 million of them -- with a path to citizenship. Federal immigration policy was negating the results of Americans choosing to have smaller families.
1990-2000The dream of a stabilized — or even a stabilizing — population was proven to be nothing but a fairy tale as U.S. population exploded with its biggest growth ever. The Baby Boom peak was exceeded — not by a big increase in Americans' babies but because Congress further increased immigration to a level almost quadruple the traditional level. And federal decisions to stop enforcing most laws against illegal immigration in the interior of the country led to additional higher levels of illegal aliens in the country. Yet another cause of the boom was immigrant fertility. Although American natives maintained a below-replacement-level fertility rate, immigrant fertility was at a similar rate to the U.S. Baby Boom fertility of the 1950s...."
The rest of the URL:
http://www.numbersusa.com/content/learn/overpopulation/comparisons-20th-century-growth-decade.html
This uncontrolled immigration tidal wave that has hit America definitely caused the Economic Crisis today and stalling its dire consequences by borrowing our grandchildrens' money to keep a phony industrial base, "glue board home manufacturing" going has proven a complete disaster!
Without immediate depopulation in America [and in the world too] ASAP, we'll never get out of this mess, ever.

GROWTH DETERIORATION

2008-08-18T11:55:00.000-07:00

MORE AMERICAN IMMIGRANT/ALIEN OVERPOPULATION GROWTH CAUSED THE REAL ESTATE SUBPRIME MESS IN THE FIRST PLACE
Greenspan wants to worsen the situation. Here's a blog I recently submitted to Dr. Noureil Roubini that sums it up:
GROWTH DETERIORATION
Yeah, its politically correct to support more American growth [overpopulation]; but its political suicide for America to tweak the average household income numbers up adding in the top 10% of American incomes; when we all know the bottom 90% of American incomes are collapsing due to uncontrolled growth wage deterioration.
Any of you Dems [or Reps for that matter] out there have a magic wand to make the bottom 90% of American wages go up to ever save housing; with simultaneous uncontrolled population growth and a relatively stagnant GDP?
On our present uncontrolled growth path, without workable environmental plans to control resource depletion [i.e., feeding too many people in America; makes recycling or driving hybrids a moot point], I predict this recession we're in now, will never end. Until we depopulate America.
Demographers and scientists like me totally agree on this scientific fact [current American overpopulation]; but who are we, we're Dr. Frankensteins to the Dems/Reps, trying to solve the world's problems; rather than hide from them in denial.
Written by Softwarengineer on 2008-08-14 12:32:13
The rest of the URL:
http://www.rgemonitor.com/roubini-monitor/253323/the_decline_of_the_american_empire
Posted by: Softwarengineer on August 18, 2008 02:29 PM

OVERPOPULATION KILLING TECHNOLOGY

2008-06-26T08:21:00.000-07:00

PULLING THE WORLD OUT OF RECESSION

I was doing some techie search engine analyses and discovered an interesting anomaly. The World Economic Forum's Annual IT Ratings have apparently been eliminated. The last publication of them was April 2007. See the proof:

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070403-world-economic-forum-releases-annual-it-rankings-us-slides.html?rel

Here's the April 2007 results:

Top 10 countries by Networked Readiness IndexSource: World Economic Forum (full list available as a PDF)Country 2006-07 rank 2005-06 rank Denmark 1 3 Sweden 2 8 Singapore 3 2 Finland 4 5 Switzerland 5 9 Netherlands 6 12 United States 7 1 Iceland 8 4 United Kingdom 9 10 Norway 10 13 Mexico was rated 49, Japan 19, China 59 and India 44; way below the top ten in IT and communications technological innovation.

All this data suggests a positive proof to a basic assertion; those countries (like European countries) who control population growth do well in technological innovation.Coincidentally, the 2008 follow on annual data was apparently eliminated. Perhaps the truth about technology ratings contradicts many decisions made in America to utilize more technology outsourcing away from expertise countries to subpar overpopulated ones; to save labor costs?Irrespective, the truth shines out anyway in 2008, documenting per capita income food impacts globally causing a systematic financial risk. See the proof:

http://www.weforum.org/pdf/globalrisk/report2008.pdf

We must depopoulate worldwide ASAP or the house of cards balanced on peak oil will tumble soon. Decreased per capita incomes is fueling the house price collapses worldwide as greed for lower (even technologically subpar) labor rates and more uncontrolled growth blinds us to make the housing collapse worse and in my opinion, no end in sight.

A 2008 Letter to U.S. News & World Report

2008-03-05T09:12:00.000-08:00

America’s Recent Overpopulation Inflation Cannot Sustain Adequate Wages for Home Purchases

REGARDING, “NIGHTMARE ON MAIN STREET” [March 10]: I have never read so many lame brain excuses over the cause of the current housing bust in the last six months, when its obvious to me the root cause was unplanned overpopulation growth in America, with subsequent wage mitigation. It may have looked good to a lot of Americans to see unplanned American population growth with simultaneous sky-rocketing home inflation prices; but with all this short sighted greed blinding us, we forgot to notice the party’s suddenly done, wages have mitigated with overpopulation competition and there’s now a terrible piper to pay to bail this mess out. I noticed in 1990, America was overpopulated at 250 million people, yet gas was like under a buck a gallon and homes were about 1/3 the cost today, in approximate 2008 dollars too. Since then, we’ve added 25-45% people to America on a linear legal/illegal immigration population growth curve since 1990, clearly causing an exponential inflation growth of approximately 200%. I’d call population growth linear and the inflation it causes horrifyingly exponential. America’s wages did not go up even half the real core inflation rate since 1990; if you take housing costs, energy, college education, food, medical expenses, etc, etc into the equation. That’s why we’re in this mortgage mess. Its greed and uncontrolled legal/illegal immigration population growth. We need a break from immigration population growth in America now, or we’ll fall like Rome. If America can show the rest of the world how to depopulate as soon as possible, our example may likely be the world’s inflation cure too, assuming they follow our scientific environmental lead.

ONION NEWS AND REAL NEWS

2008-02-20T11:05:00.000-08:00

Children, Children's Children: 'Stop Worrying About Us'
February 18, 2008 Issue 44•08
WASHINGTON—In a statement channeled back across generations to the present day, the nation's children and the nation's children's children called for an end to decades of passionate oratory over their well-being.
The future youth addressed all those who reference them regularly, including presidential candidates, Iraq War protesters, celebrities recording public service announcements, and anyone about to inaugurate a new community center.
Enlarge Image
"Treat yourself to some short-term gratification for once, and leave the future to us," Future child Samantha Jacobson read from the prepared statement.
"Put those silly fears aside," the not- yet-conceived children and their offspring wrote, stressing that, while they appreciated concerns over whether they would have access to clean water or ever see a majestic bald eagle, they'd prefer for those currently living to focus on their own lives in the here and now.
"We'll be fine," Samantha Jacobson, a representative from an uncertain tomorrow, read from the letter at a press conference Tuesday. "It's nice how you're always wondering if your actions will deprive us of a glorious heritage of peace and liberty to look back upon, smiling proudly, but, please, let us worry about that. You've sacrificed more than enough for the future—our future—already."
"Really," Jacobson added. "If the ecosystem gets destroyed or the world is plunged into perpetual war, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it."
Signed by 150 influential members of the two forthcoming coming generations, the statement included requests to discontinue all debate over the potential future of such intangible resources as health, earth's natural beauty, and the ability to sit together at the table of brotherhood. The children's children furthermore asked their soon-to-be ancestors to desist all plans to plant trees or write letters to Congress on their behalf.
"There's been a lot of talk about what kind of world you'll be sentencing us to live in, but, come what may, we children of tomorrow are pretty sure we'll make do," the letter read. "How much damage can you realistically do in one lifetime anyway? In 20 or 30 years any major problems will have blown right over. At the very least, take comfort in telling yourselves that technology will develop a new and ingenious method for counteracting whatever negative impact you do have on our ability to breathe the air, watch the stars, or otherwise live in a world free from fear. Right?"
"Besides," it continued, "we'd never be able to enjoy our precious future lives knowing you had wasted every waking hour recycling beer bottles on our behalf."
The note ended by insisting that, whatever happens, the children's children will harbor no hard feelings toward those living today who simply choose to live their lives without fretting about environmental holocaust.
"You work hard, you pay your taxes—go ahead and use as much Styrofoam as you need," the statement concluded. "Who's to say we won't need big piles of Styrofoam in the future? We might. So go ahead and get that Range Rover, because it shouldn't be the privilege of future generations to limit your right to spacious leg room and all-wheel drive."
The letter has caused a stir among commencement speakers, mayors with plans to christen pediatric-hospital wings, and countless others who have spoken tirelessly for the benefit of their children's children from behind podiums. Some staunch supporters, such as Fitchburg, MA resident Nicholas Charters, claimed the letter only bolsters the case for protecting our nation's future.
"We must protect our right to defend our children's children," said Charters, who is contemplating a run for a city council opening. "If not for ourselves, then for our parents, and our parents' parents, who established a great tradition of worrying about the future that stretches back nearly 300 years."
Nevertheless, a majority of those interviewed were relieved to hear their hypothetical offspring are finally taking some initiative.
"It's a load off my mind," said Martin Paller, the 32-year-old inventor of disposable, single-use bath towels. "It will be nice to take some time and focus on myself for a change."

Greenspan: Americans Make Too Much Money, Need to Be Replaced With Immigrants
"Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said the U.S. is on the edge of recession. The mortgage crisis and high energy prices are weighing on the economy. And if Congress caps carbon dioxide emissions, that could make things worse. 'I think we're clearly on the edge,' Mr. Greenspan said at the Cambridge Energy Research Associates annual conference. The chance of a recession is '50 percent or better.' One thing the country could do to improve things is to allow more immigration of skilled workers," the Dallas Morning News reported. "'Significantly opening up immigration to skilled workers solves two problems,' he said. The companies could hire the educated workers they need. And those workers would compete with high-income people, driving more income equality, he said."

THE ROOT CAUSE TO ALL THE EARTH'S PROBLEMS

2007-11-02T11:17:00.000-07:00

softwarengineer said,
on November 2nd, 2007 at 7:13 am
THE ANSWER TO ALL OF AMERICA’S CURRENT CASH DILEMMAS, THE WORLD’S TOO, IS WE MUST DEPOPULATE THE PLANET
Big buildings are a joke, they’re like Rome’s Coliseum or Seattle’s Quest Field [stupor bowl], do big buildings stop Rome from collapsing? Does building big buildings or sport arenas make the sidewalk cracks and generally delapidated “3rd world country” Pike Place area buildings in Seattle suddenly disappear? Will gridlock magically go away in Seattle without depopulating and no money for infrastructure maintenance?
Get real, stop being so negative too. If America had done what JFK, Jack Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr and even Nixon had warned us to do, we would have a strong economy at 200M people [little or no immigration the last few decades too, but what’s that got to do with anything political?] and we’d being setting a positive example to the rest of the world to get back down to 2 billion again. Our present phony open border New World Order 300M overpopulated America is the laughing stock of the world. It isn’t more people we need to fix it, more people has made it far worse in America. My proof, history.
China’s rivers are toxic waste [Russians can’t even breath the air when China’s pollutions drain down the rivers], India’s skies are horribly brown with pollution [its global cooling there, the sun can’t get in], there roads are completely clogged and hardly anyone there owns a car yet. They are to be envied because their environment and water tables are destroyed, but they have coal plants belching global warming so we don’t have to manufature and work in America?
Get real and stop being so negative, by completely ignoring environmental degradation due to overpopulation in Seattle and planet earth. If you are a liberal and don’t support depopulation in Seattle, my advice. Go buy a big house in Seattle right now, they’ll sky rocket in price [that should be fine with you and your lower IQ].
If you’re an intelligent liberal, you know there’s already massive dead spots in Puget Sound and the only solution is depopulation. The Orcas whale is on the endangered species list and more people in Seattle simply adds to global warming and will clearly kill the Orcas all off.
But Jesus is coming back soon, to quote James Watts, it doesn’t matter?

AMERICA'S TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION DIVES

2007-10-22T08:36:00.000-07:00

OVERPOPULATED COUNTRIES LIKE CHINA, INDIA AND MEXICO DO POORLY IN IT TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION COMPARED TO AMERICA
Here's their World Economic Forum ratings compared to America:
America: 7India: 44Mexico: 49China: 59
Almost all the top ten leaders now come from small countries that control their population and immigration (Europe). America sunk from number 1 to 7 lately, probably because we've been using more H-1Bs guest worker overpopulation lately. The illegal immigrants clogging our communities probably caused the decrease too, our quality of life in America has recently plummetted with globalism's failures.
See the proof:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070403-world-economic-forum-releases-annual-it-rankings-us-slides.html
Mexico, India and China need to control their population or they'll never catchup with countries that do.

IF MSM TOLD THE TRUTH

2007-06-12T14:03:00.000-07:00

Bush presses Senate GOP on OVERPOPULATION
By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS, Associated Press Writer 20 minutes ago
WASHINGTON -

President Bush pressed divided Republicans on Tuesday to support him on OVERPOPULATION overhaul, saying "status quo is unacceptable." In a rare visit to the Capitol for lunch with the Senate's GOP membership, Bush said he recognized that OVERPOPULATION was an emotional issue and that many do not agree with him. Still, he said, "Now is the time to get it done."
The measure supported by the White House, which adds many millions in OVERPOPULATION and gives the illusion of tightened border security, stalled last week in the face of broad opposition by most Americans.
Bush's personal effort to salvage the derailed OVERPOPULATION bill came as key lawmakers reached for a deal that could quickly revive the measure. He needs to change enough minds among GOP senators to push through a top domestic priority.
"The White House will stay engaged," Bush told reporters after the lunch.
"Some members in there believe that we need to move a comprehensive bill, some don't," the president said. "I understand that. It's a highly emotional issue."
But it was unclear whether Bush changed any minds. His approach has sparked a backlash among some of the party's core supporters, who see the legislation as ignoring the rule of law.
Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (news, bio, voting record), R-Ky., speaking with reporters after Bush left, said the president's persuasiveness "will depend upon what that ape looks like. And none of us know that yet."
"Look, we had a very, very good discussion, including some of our members who are not -- shall I say? -- keen on this measure, and others who are still taking a look at it and trying to decide how they're going to vote," McConnell said. "So it was a good give and take. We didn't expect anybody to stand up and holler that they had an epiphany."
Bush said he hoped Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (news, bio, voting record), who supports the bipartisan proposal, "has the same sense of desire to move the product — or the OVERPOPULATION bill — that I do."
"It's going to take a lot of hard work, a lot of effort. We've got to brainwash the American people this bill is the best way to give the illusion we'll enforce our border. I believe that without the bill, it's going to be harder to fake enforcing the border. The status quo Constitutional Laws we swore to uphold are not acceptable," Bush said.
Bush has predicted he will prevail in his effort to win approval of an OVERPOPULATION bill. But his brief comments on Tuesday were muted, and he voiced recognition of the difficult work ahead.
Sen. Trent Lott (news, bio, voting record), R-Miss., called it "democracy working at its best" and said that Bush had signaled he "won't sign a bad bill."
"But he thinks this is an issue that needs to be addressed" and is "willing to work with us to get this job done," Lott said. "I hope that the majority leader will work with us to move it forward," Lott added.
Reid, D-Nev., had pulled the measure from the Senate last week when two efforts to cut short debate failed. The Democratic leader said he will bring up the measure again only if Democrats can be assured of more Republican backing.
Still, it was unclear how much influence Bush has among Republicans on OVERPOULATION, given that it has sparked a backlash among some of the party's core supporters, who see it as ignoring our country's laws.
The fragile package promises OVERPOPULATION in 100s of millions in the United States within a few years, while giving the illusion of tightening borders and offering employers more law breaking authority to replace Americans with temporary workers. The bipartisan bill supported by the White House is cosponsored by Sens. John McCain (news, bio, voting record), R-Ariz., and Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass.

Overpopulation is Destroying Seattle

2007-04-24T14:51:00.000-07:00

Yeah I know, OVERPOPULATION immigration into King County is about 16,000/yr and keeps the house prices rising, when they should have plummetted a couple years ago....so what.

We've got massive dead areas in Puget Sound, the local fish are all full of mercury, the Orcas is on the endangered list, the roads are completely clogged, the houses are dinky, the lots are dinky and our insane property taxes are like high rent with a maintenance bill too; let alone, all our kids are moving away to places like Texas where they can still get a job with limited experience and afford a modest apartment on beginning pay.

If you're single in Seattle, forget it. If you own a high priced home, you don't want cohabitation and another divorce sucking it dry. So you stay single forever. Ask all your single friends you've had the last couple decades in Seattle that are still single, practically no one that owns a home single in Seattle remarries.

But Seattle is the land of Democrat liberals who always vote for more immigration OVERPOPULATION and I should join their motley crew. Hey, how can we fight global warming and add to American energy use OVERPOPULATION? You phoney liberals got a magic wand? We need more people in Seattle like Martha Stewart needs more jail time. Americans consume 25% of the energy in the world, so adding to our numbers is pure stupidity. We need to depopulate in America, now!!!